[BACK TO THE GUIDE]

  • LAWRENCE MARTIN: Goldbach's Conjecture
    --- Doctor Terrel: Re: Goldbach's Conjecture
    --- LAWRENCE MARTIN: Re: Goldbach's Conjecture
    --- Doctor Terrel: Re: Goldbach's Conjecture

    TimeStamp: 07/09/97 at 00:25:46
    Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 04:25:08 +0000
    From: LMARTIN-NORTHFIELD@worldnet.att.net (LAWRENCE MARTIN)
    To: "Dr. Math" <dr.math@mathforum.org>
    Subject: Re: Goldbach's Conjecture
    Date of most recent message in thread: 07/09/97 at 00:25:46
    
    At 06:05 AM 7/8/97 +0000, you wrote:
    
    >As to your main question:  I'm not aware of any "proof" of Goldbach's 
    >Conjecture existing yet.  (Maybe you'll be the one to find it someday.
    :) ) 
    > But that doesn't mean it should be abandoned or ignored.  One thing I
    often 
    >ask my students to do is to find all possible prime number pairs whose
    sum 
    >is a particular even number, say 100.  For example, 3 & 97 make a
    sum of 
    >100, but so do 11 & 89.  My question then becomes: how many more
    pairs can 
    >be found?  It usually gets my students to thinking a lot, plus they
    learn 
    >more about the primes less than 100.
    
    I read about that in the book GREAT MATHEMATICAL MYSTERIES.  It seems that
    the higher the even number, the more ways there are of representing it as
    the sum of two primes. This makes a counterexample extremely unlikely, but,
    as mathematicians know, that is no proof!
    
    >Perhaps you are not aware of another lesser known extension to the main, 
    >popular Conjecture, the 3 prime case.  It says: All odd integers greater 
    >than 5 can be expressed as the sum of THREE primes.  For example, 
    
            I have heard of this. It is called Goldbach's Ternary Conjecture,
    while the better known part is Goldbach's Binary Conjecture.  This was also
    in the book I referred to above.  It said that the Ternary Conjecture has
    been proven for every "sufficiently large" number.  Although the book didn't
    say this, I figured out that if Goldbach's Binary Conjecture is true,
    Goldbach's Ternary conjecture would have to be true.  However, if the
    Ternary Conjecture is proven true for sure, that would not automatically
    mean that the Binary Conjecture is true.
            
            Thanks for answering my letter!  Could you tell me if you know of
    any other good books besides the one I spoke of above, GREAT MATHMATICAL
    MYSTERIES, that contain good discussions of Goldbach's conjecture?
    
                            Sincerely,
                            Daniel
    
    
    Reload with all available headers
    Reload with word-wrapping on
    Reload with live HTML
    Put a next to this question
    Remove the next to this question

    Post Memo

    Upload an Image

    Compose Answer
    Are you sure?


    Triage Area


    Holding Tank

    Post-Op Area

    Administration

    Archives

    Math Resources

    Help!
    Search the Doctor's Office:
    (finds documents with all your search terms)

    Change the Threading of the Problems