The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Discussion: sci.math

An unmoderated newsgroup on general and advanced mathematics.

To request a record of all of your discussion posts archived here, contact the discussion administrators before the last week of December 2017.

Important: please include the mathforum.org username that appears after "Welcome, __," to the left.

Advanced Search
Messages: 1,440,497   Topics: 213,201   Last Post: Nov 20, 2017 6:39 PM  


Pages: 14214 [ Previous | 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 14214 | Next ]
Last Post # Topic Author
11/14/17
1 Read Re: You are trying my patience morons. Unless you start coming up
with valid questions, I may leave sci.math.
Me
11/14/17
4 Read Re: You are trying my patience morons. Unless you start coming up
with valid questions, I may leave sci.math.
bursejan@gmail.com
11/14/17
1 Read Re: Why do we need those real non-constructible numbers? Jan Burse
11/14/17
3 Read Only Quantum Physics Can Bend the Laws of Thermodynamics? Pentcho Valev
11/14/17
1 Read Re: There is no such thing as instantaneous rate of change, says the
idiot John "Troll Boy" Gabriel
Dan Christensen
11/14/17
1 Read heart beat equation drhuang57@gmail.com
11/14/17
3 Read Kip Thorne Lies Blatantly and Saves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev
11/14/17
2 Read Re: Student realises piecewise functions are fake! The crisis in the
BIG STUPID continues.
bursejan@gmail.com
11/14/17
3 Read The 2002 Violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics Pentcho Valev
11/14/17
1 Read Re: Only one stupid (Zelos Malum) is still claiming that m+n is not a
factor of f(x+n)-f(x-m).
zelos.malum@gmail.com
11/14/17
1 Read Re: Dedekind and Cauchy were wrong - there is no valid construction
of real number.
zelos.malum@gmail.com
11/14/17
1 Read Re: There is no such thing as instantaneous rate of change says
absolute moron JG
Dan Christensen
11/13/17
8 Read how to assign a value or define a reasonable value to this number x: narutocanada@gmail.com
11/13/17
1 Read Re: Only one stupid (Zelos Malum) is still claiming that m+n is not a
factor of f(x+n)-f(x-m).
zelos.malum@gmail.com
11/13/17
2 Read Re: Dedekind and Cauchy were wrong - there is no valid construction
of real number.
Me
Pages: 14214 [ Previous | 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 14214 | Next ]

Unread Denotes unread messages since your last visit.
Updated Denotes updated messages since your last visit.
Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this discussion

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.