Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Last Post

#

Topic

Author


1


Re: Proof S = Lim S was Euler's definition in just a few lines.

bursejan@gmail.com


13


Re: About the spamming troll John Gabriel in his own words (October 2017)

bursejan@gmail.com


2


Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...

bursejan@gmail.com


3


Re: for all and for every , how to avoid the subtle contradiction on using qualifiers?

bursejan@gmail.com


8


for all and for every , how to avoid the subtle contradiction on using qualifiers?

Lee Philip


1


redefine force as dQ/dt= electric current // redefine Magnetic Field to contain electric current inside itself//Chapter 4 ATOM TOTALITY

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


2


Re: 20. Are NTNU Norway's Espen Jakobsen, Finn Knudsen, Harald Krogstad as dumb as Konyberg about basic Calculus (see below)

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


1


22) Are NTNU Norway's Espen Jakobsen, Finn Knudsen, Harald Krogstad as dumb as Konyberg about basic Calculus (see below)

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


8


prePage25, 32, Coulomb's law as EMgravity; Sun & planets helical motion in space/AtomTotalityUniverse/ textbook 8th ed 2017

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


1


+16) Are Gottingen's Thomas Schick, Anita Schöbel a s dumb as Franz in Conic = Oval, not ellipse (proofs listed below)

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com


8


Something is rotten in MathStackExchange

wolfgang.mueckenheim@hsaugsburg.de


2


Re: The bogus set concept.

Brian Tenneson


1


Re: The bogus set concept.

Me


1


Re: Something is rotten in MathStackExchange

bursejan@gmail.com


2


Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...

FromTheRafters


Denotes unread messages since your last visit.


Denotes updated messages since your last visit.



