On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 2:22:33 PM UTC-4, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 9:00:49 PM UTC+3, Dan Christensen wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 1:15:11 PM UTC-4, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 7:59:35 PM UTC+3, Dan Christensen wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 12:10:32 PM UTC-4, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > > > > > Is it really the greatest tragedy on earth when the vast majority of the alleged top most genius mathematicians are really BIG TROLLS who can't comprehend the most simple facts that had been discovered thousands of years back about the fact of the real numbers being only positive constructible numbers and nothing else for sure > > > > > > > > > > > > > In BKK's mathematical fantasy world, the square root of 2, 40 degree angles and 0 do not exist. Really! If he can't solve it by his counting his fingers and toes, the solution does not exist. Needless to say, there is not much call for his form of, ahem... "mathematical insight" in the real world these days. BKK is a crank and a troll. > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com > > > > Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com > > > > > > Don't turn to be a lier, it is true that you are a loser > > > > > > When did I say that sqrt(2) doesn't exist? wonder! > > > > I remember you were unconvinced by my posting earlier this year of the square root of 2 to 1 million decimal places. It's good to see you have finally come around on this one issue. Maybe there is some hope for you. (Don't hold your breath, folks!) > > Do you mean that one million decimal places of sqrt(2) would make it equals, wonder! >
I mean you that can get a decimal representation of the square of 2 to ANY accuracy required (+-10^-1000000) in that case.
> Even a universe size of decimal places where each one (mm) cube contains one trillion decimal places would never make them equals because they belong to two different words, (rationals and irrationals) where they never can meet for sure > > Even though the task is certainly impossible by all the current and future means for sure > > And this proves only your vast ignorance on this fundamental issue, but luckily you are not alone in this carpentry talents world >
Thanks for confirming your ignorance of such a fundamental issue in mathematics, and that you STILL believe that the number that is the square root of 2 does not exist (along with 40 degree angles and the number 0).
Do you really expect to sell this bullshit, or are you simply trying to confuse and mislead students for your own despicable purposes?