The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: I rarely make silly mistakes, but Euler made a huge blunder in S
= Lim S

Replies: 1   Last Post: Sep 29, 2017 8:53 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View

Posts: 5,511
Registered: 9/25/16
Re: I rarely make silly mistakes, but Euler made a huge blunder in S
= Lim S

Posted: Sep 29, 2017 8:53 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

The meaning of the term "real number", is not
some numeric representation.

If you agree that Cauchy sequences have a limit,
then "real numbers" do also exist.

So much for the little mistakes.

Am Freitag, 29. September 2017 22:05:16 UTC+2 schrieb John Gabriel:
> On Friday, 29 September 2017 09:43:37 UTC-5, wrote:
> > "rarely"? You shouldn't make mistakes at all.
> Chuckle. This from a fart bag whose every line is a mistake. Tsk, tsk.

> > For example you don't seem to understand that decimal representations are Cauchy.
> Oh I understand that perfectly well. The problem is with you who do not understand that real numbers don't exist because you are a moron.
> <too much scat ignored>

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.