On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 1:58:04 PM UTC-7, Me wrote: > On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 10:47:08 PM UTC+2, burs...@gmail.com wrote: > > > But Netzweltler's are of interest, since they might show > > some very juvenile believes, maybe even not their own, > > just some mish mash from dunno where, maybe from the land of Oz? > > The problem with "Netzweltler" (as you will soon find out for yourself, I guess) is that he suffices the original definition of a crank: > > "A crank is defined as a man who cannot be turned." (Nature, 8 Nov 1906, 25/2)
I don't buy that. Who establishes the truth. I won't turn to the Status Quo.