The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: unification of conic sections with regular polyhedra
Replies: 8   Last Post: Oct 8, 2017 11:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 17,471
Registered: 3/31/08
unification of conic sections with regular polyhedra
Posted: Oct 4, 2017 4:43 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Alright, before 2018, I want significant progress on this topic, in order to start the new 6th edition. I will rename it, as TRUE Math texts, previously called Correcting Math. It will be the basis of all math textbooks used from Grade School through College. I will write some of it directly for the students. But many sections are outlines for other teachers to fill in the text.

This last topic of the unification of conic sections, planar figures with regular polyhedra, 3rd dimension solid figures, is questionable as to whether there is even a unification possible. I am going purely on a hunch.

But, I know for sure of a unification of Elliptic Geometry with Hyperbolic Geometry with Euclidean Geometry. I am certain there is unification in that, which follows the formula::

Euclidean Geometry = Elliptic Geometry unioned with Hyperbolic Geometry

What it means is that Elliptic and Hyperbolic geometries are not independent existing geometries. They are not stand alone geometries. But rather, they occur when you have Euclidean geometry with broken symmetry.

The finest example is a straight line in Euclidean Geometry as |

Now, you can have a Elliptic curved line as ) and a Hyperbolic curved line as ( and when you join the two curved lines )( they cancel and yield as byproduct |.

So if you have Euclidean Geometry, and you break-its-symmetry. What you then have is elliptic and hyperbolic geometry as byproducts.

Old Math thinks there are 3 separate and independent geometries. New Math says there is one and only one geometry-- Euclidean which is composed of elliptic unioned hyperbolic.

So the symmetry sounds like a key concept to unify conics with polyhedra.

So, starting a list of plane symmetry and of axis of symmetry, here we mean reflective symmetry.

cube and octahedron have 9 planes of symmetry

tetrahedron and square pyramid have 6 planes of symmetry

rectangular solid has 3 planes of symmetry

dodecahedron and icosahedron has 15 planes of symmetry


oval and parabola have 1 axis of symmetry

hyperbola and ellipse has 2 axis of symmetry

3-gon, equilateral triangle has 3 axis of symmetry

4-gon, square, 4 axis of symmetry

5-gon, regular pentagon, 5 axis of symmetry

6-gon, hexagon, 6 axis of symmetry

10-gon, 10 axis of symmetry

So if there is a unification, I suspect to unifyer is symmetry.

Now notice a circle has infinite axis of symmetry as well as a sphere. So we have a immediate tie-in of the largest. Now for the smallest, being 1 axis of symmetry and 1 plane of symmetry. The smallest 3D, I have is the rectangular solid with 3 planes of symmetry.

So, the first question-- is there a 3rd D object with 1 plane of symmetry.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.