The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Replies: 7   Last Post: Oct 7, 2017 7:50 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 248
Registered: 12/20/15
Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Posted: Oct 5, 2017 2:34 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

After serious thinking 7777777 wrote :
> torstai 5. lokakuuta 2017 8.44.17 UTC+3 Zelos Malum kirjoitti:
>> 0.999... must equal 1, there cannot be any other way for it to be.
> fail.
> in real numbers 0.(9) is not equal to 1.

Yes, it is. If it and zero were two different real numbers, there would
be at least one more real number sitting between them.

See the density property of the reals.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.