
Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Posted:
Oct 5, 2017 4:58 AM


Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 08:01:05 UTC+2 skrev 7777777: > torstai 5. lokakuuta 2017 8.44.17 UTC+3 Zelos Malum kirjoitti: > > 0.999... must equal 1, there cannot be any other way for it to be. > > fail. > > in real numbers 0.(9) is not equal to 1.
Incorrect, as per usual. It is trivial to prove it using dedekinds, cauchy or any number of other methods.

