The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Replies: 2   Last Post: Oct 5, 2017 7:55 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dan Christensen

Posts: 8,219
Registered: 7/9/08
Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Posted: Oct 5, 2017 7:55 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 7:20:43 AM UTC-4, John Gabriel wrote:

> The conclusion is that Euler's definition is ill-formed and the orangutans of the past 300 years have shame written all over their stupid faces.

No, the conclusion is that John "Troll Boy" Gabriel has much egg on this face for this, the biggest blunder of his trolling career: Deliberately misquoting Euler and being caught out again and again. What a moron.


Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at
Visit my Math Blog at

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.