The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Replies: 2   Last Post: Oct 7, 2017 4:39 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Markus Klyver

Posts: 702
Registered: 5/26/17
Re: Finally the discussion is over: S = Lim S is a bad definition.
Posted: Oct 5, 2017 9:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Den onsdag 4 oktober 2017 kl. 11:27:43 UTC+2 skrev John Gabriel:
> On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 20:32:47 UTC-4, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Well its the mean value between 0.999... and 1.0.
>
> What are you saying you baboon, what are you mumbling about? You can only calculate an arithmetic mean between well formed numbers you moron! 0.999... is NOT a number of any kind. It represents a SERIES. If you define it stupidly as Euler did to be equal to its limit, then you are taking the mean of 1 and 1. There is nothing to do you HUGE APE!!!!
>
> Grow a brain. You sit pounding out your brain farts on sci.math. Get a job idiot!!!!! No one will hire you once they read the crap you write here.
>
> <6 year old rant>


0.999... is a short hand for an infinite sum which we define as the limit of a finite sum as the number of terms approaches infinity.

Den torsdag 5 oktober 2017 kl. 08:01:05 UTC+2 skrev 7777777:
> torstai 5. lokakuuta 2017 8.44.17 UTC+3 Zelos Malum kirjoitti:
> > 0.999... must equal 1, there cannot be any other way for it to be.
>
> fail.
>
> in real numbers 0.(9) is not equal to 1.


It indeed does. Or how do you define 0.(9)?



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.