The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: The follies of Dedekind and Cauchy with respect to "real numbers" exposed
Replies: 10   Last Post: Oct 5, 2017 7:54 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Markus Klyver

Posts: 702
Registered: 5/26/17
Re: The follies of Dedekind and Cauchy with respect to "real numbers" exposed
Posted: Oct 5, 2017 7:54 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Den onsdag 4 oktober 2017 kl. 12:49:33 UTC+2 skrev genm...@gmail.com:
> On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 23:15:05 UTC-4, Zelos Malum wrote:
> > Den tisdag 3 oktober 2017 kl. 17:31:40 UTC+2 skrev Markus Klyver:
> > > Den onsdag 27 september 2017 kl. 00:21:48 UTC+2 skrev John Gabriel:
> > > > On Tuesday, 26 September 2017 16:34:07 UTC-4, Markus Klyver wrote:
> > > > > Den måndag 25 september 2017 kl. 14:19:56 UTC+2 skrev John Gabriel:
> > > > > > On Monday, 4 September 2017 05:58:07 UTC-4, John Gabriel wrote:
> > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-mOEooW03iLSTROakNyVXlQUEU
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Comments are unwelcome and will be ignored.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Posted on this newsgroup in the interests of public education and to eradicate ignorance and stupidity from mainstream mythmatics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > gilstrang@gmail.com (MIT)
> > > > > > > huizenga@psu.edu (HARVARD)
> > > > > > > andersk@mit.edu (MIT)
> > > > > > > david.ullrich@math.okstate.edu (David Ullrich)
> > > > > > > djoyce@clarku.edu
> > > > > > > markcc@gmail.com

> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is easily seen by all the comments that cranks and trolls who cannot refute or answer for their ignorance and stupidity will resort to libel and ad hominem. We have very well trained Jew lackeys simply posting their anti-semite crap over and over again. Well, they are getting paid because they can't find real jobs anywhere else.

> > > > >
> > > > > You just called me a Jew and hoped Jews would die a painful death. I'm not sure we're the ones adhering to ad hominems and racist xenophobic slur.

> > > >
> > > > Er no. I have never called you a Jew. I asked if you are a Jew lackey. Two very different things. You are not fortunate enough to be a Jew, only the bitch of a Jew. Chuckle.
> > > >
> > > > You are the one bringing up Jews and xenophobic slurs all the time because you are a troll and have nothing to say about mathematics. Every time you are refuted, you try a Mark Chu Carroll. But retard that you are, you don't realise this is not helping your case at all.

> > >
> > > Except I'm the one to tell you don't understand how real numbers are constructed. You are literary setting up strawmans and attack those, instead of bother to learn anything new.

> >
> > He does it cause he cannot understand them properly.

>
>
> Hey Stupid. Even "Me" has finally understood that my definition is a D. Cut. Ask him to explain to you moron!
>
> L={-1 < x < pi} and R={pi < x < 4} where x \in Q
>
> is a valid D Cut.
>
> You can choose any other elements m and n such that m < pi < n and it will conform as follows:
>
> L={m < x < pi} and R={pi < x < n} where x \in Q
>
> END OF DISCUSSION.


It will not be a partition of ?. Where's -17 in your cut? Where's 9911/4?




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.