Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Topic:
How we get a Ellipse from a Conic, and how we get a Oval from Cylinder Sections knifes that are V and asymmetrical V shaped
Replies:
27
Last Post:
Oct 8, 2017 12:41 AM




Re: How we get a Ellipse from a Conic, and how we get a Oval from Cylinder Sections knifes that are V and asymmetrical V shaped
Posted:
Oct 6, 2017 1:05 AM


On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 6:59:20 PM UTC7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 4:55:17 PM UTC5, qbwr...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 1:11:12 PM UTC7, Dan Christensen wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 12:38:55 PM UTC4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > > Alright, if our knife in Conic and Cylinder... > > > > > > Archie, for $52.49, you can save yourself all this embarrassment. Order the "Conic Sections Model" made of transparent plastic. See for yourself  no knives or scissors required  that at an ellipse is indeed a conic section. > > > > > > http://www.eaieducation.com/Product/520610/Conic_Sections_Model.aspx > > > > > > If you can't afford it, maybe we can take up a collection for you. > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > I have seriously considered buying and mailing a model to Archie. > > > > It seems essential that the model be very precisely made. > > It seems essential that the eccentricity of the model be almost 1. > > It seems essential that the intersection be able to be removed, flipped > > in all four possible orientations and replaced to see it is an exact fit. > > > > If any of those were not the case then I'm certain that Archie > > would dream up some tortured convolution to claim that this doesn't > > disprove his delusion and in fact it actually proves he is correct. > > > > It would be cute if there were two spheres of just the right size were included. > > > > I have not found a model online available for purchase that I thought > > would be sufficiently overwhelmingly convincing. I have looked at > > making such a model by hand and I don't think it would be precise enough. > > > > Way back soon after he started screeching his oval nonsense I told him > > that he should go to a machine shop and have them produce a really > > precise model out of steel that would definitely settle this question. > > > > He didn't do that, just like he doesn't do anything else that might > > refute his mental illness. He refuses, for example, to look at web > > pages that people point out to him which would refute his illness, > > because he claims to be frightened of malware, but at the same > > time he is happy to go to web pages and scrape the lists of names of > > false foggy fools who won't teach his mental illness to the world. > > > > If anyone can find a sufficiently overwhelmingly convincing model > > available for purchase then I would chip in for the price. > > > > I've also considered doing the same for other models which would > > refute his mental illness point by point. But they would have to be > > overwhelmingly obviously convincing to the mind of a twelve year old. > > They can't involve algebra, Archie seems to have lost all that long ago. > > They can't involve proof, Archie seems to have lost all that long ago. > > > > I'm becoming more and more convinced that people making posts just > > telling him that he is wrong and stupid only reinforce Archie's > > mental illness, they show him that no one, or almost no one, believes > > what he is saying and that reinforces his belief of how special he > > imagines himself to be. > > > > If in the first few days of a new novel claim posted by Archie, long > > before his dog brain has become invested in the claim, if someone > > takes the time to obviously simply prove at the level that a > > twelveyearold can see that there is a mistake then there have been > > a number of cases where Archie silently drops that claim, never says > > a word about how he was wrong, and moves on to something else. > > But once Archie has fully invested his dog brain in a claim then > > there seems to be nothing that can change what is left of his mind. > > Well thanks for the thoughts, but I already proved several times over that a cone is always a Oval section
No, this is false. Do you have a point to make?
 Jan



