The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: 2)Gottingen's Max Wardetzky, Ingo Witt, are you as
dumb and messy about Conics as Franz? Oval is the conic sect
ion, never ellipse

Replies: 3   Last Post: Oct 6, 2017 3:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Me

Posts: 1,410
Registered: 1/23/16
Re: 2)Gottingen's Max Wardetzky, Ingo Witt, are you
as dumb and messy about Conics as Franz? Oval is the conic
section, never ellipse

Posted: Oct 6, 2017 3:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> Franz wrote:
>>
>> ...that certain cone sections [...] are ellipses.
>>


Right. You will find a simple proof for that claim below.

Some preliminaries:

Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used in the proof:

^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
/ | \
. | .
| | |
. | .
\ | /
`. | .´
y <----------+ <= x=0

Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---´ <= x = h
/ |´ \
/ ´ | \
/ ´ | \
x = 0 => ´-------+-------\
/ a | \

Proof:

r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse

qed

@Archie: Yes, this proves that (certain) cone sections "as depicted in my diagram" are ellipses.

Still not convinced? Can you point out an error in my simple calculation (of the shape of the coneic section) above?



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.