The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: I rarely make silly mistakes, but Euler made a huge blunder in S
= Lim S

Replies: 6   Last Post: Oct 6, 2017 3:42 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
bursejan@gmail.com

Posts: 4,532
Registered: 9/25/16
Re: I rarely make silly mistakes, but Euler made a huge blunder in S
= Lim S

Posted: Oct 6, 2017 3:42 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I guess he means
{ (-?, m) u (m, k), (k, n) u (n, ?) }
Thats kind of nitpicking.

Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017 21:33:00 UTC+2 schrieb Markus Klyver:
> No, the set { (m, k), (k, n) } is not the same set as { (-?, m), (m, k), (k, n), (n, ?) }. You're wrong as usual, crank.




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.