The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Replies: 9   Last Post: Oct 23, 2017 10:43 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 330
Registered: 11/4/16
Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3
= 0.333...

Posted: Oct 7, 2017 2:08 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

torstai 5. lokakuuta 2017 16.12.34 UTC+3 kirjoitti:
> There is no S(oo), there is no index n=oo.


There is S(?), there is index n = ?
look at:

> Only lim n->oo S(n), which happens is can
> be written as sum_i=1^oo a(i)

you contradict yourself.
sum_i=1^oo a(i) is S(?)

> Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017 05:56:03 UTC+2 schrieb 7777777:

> > keskiviikko 4. lokakuuta 2017 17.31.48 UTC+3 kirjoitti:
> > > Still struggling with "S=Lim S", your own
> > > blunder, bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains?

> >
> > why don't you answer to my criticism? How do you end up with S(?) = 1?
> > You have only shown how S(?) = 0.(9)
> > Do you just simply put 0.(9) = 1, but why? It is just because you say so?
> > In doing so, can you just put everything that you want to be equal to anything you want? Just because that's what you want.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.