The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Kick out the insane stalkers from sci.math-- Dan Christensen and
Mike Moroney, Jan Bielawski, Franz

Replies: 6   Last Post: Nov 9, 2017 1:14 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jan Bielawski

Posts: 1,037
Registered: 5/21/05
Re: Kick out the insane stalkers from sci.math-- Dan Christensen and
Mike Moroney, Jan Bielawski, Franz

Posted: Nov 7, 2017 4:56 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 12:36:30 PM UTC-8, John Gabriel wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:10:53 UTC-5, Jan wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 12:18:36 AM UTC-8, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 7:55:55 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > I should include the failed imp Jan Burse, who, his parents made a mistake by sending to college when he belongs in the circus of europe as a clown.
> > > >
> > > > Both Jan and Dan have screws missing in their heads-- for they think everything of the Past is absolute truth error free.

> >
> > Yes, FAPP it is error-free. There are unanswered questions, of course, but
> > other than that mathematics is _FAPP_ correct.
> >

> > > > Their minds so wooden they cannot understand Boole made a arbitrary choice he selecting the truth table of AND.
> >
> > This is your problem and your error. In general, you are an ignoramus with
> > arrogance to match (a standard combination, BTW).
> >

> > > Most of the issues you mentioned are actually quite correct,
> >
> > No, they are actually incorrect.
> >

> > > and the whole story seems a matter of huge corruption in our alleged modern mathematics.
> >
> > There is no "huge corruption" in mathematics, this is all ignorant nonsense,
> > if you believe that, I have a bridge to sell.

> I am not even going to try and defend AP because he is a lunatic. However, I am not so sure there is no intellectual dishonesty in mainstream academia. I am convinced there is much of it.

Yes, there is _some_ but it's not noticeably worse than in any other
domain of human organised activity. So it's a question of the order of
magnitude, and the order of magnitude of what's happening in the academia
(science and math - I'm leaving all the "soft departments" aside as I
believe those ones most definitely DO have a problem) is not IMHO anywhere
near anything that would justify the phrase "huge corruption".

> With respect to truth tables, well, it's hard to know who came up with the idea first but it was Wittgenstein who first published his ideas on the same.
> There is most definitely a disconnect between Boolean logic and natural language logic which identifies valid inferences by their lexical and syntactic features.

Yes, that was debated a lot. Mathematics normally uses Boolean logic,
other systems were investigated motivated by certain paradoxical
consequences or experiments (quantum mechanics).


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.