The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Tim Chow in Forcing for dummies
Replies: 2   Last Post: Nov 8, 2017 8:50 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Alan Smaill

Posts: 1,103
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Tim Chow in Forcing for dummies
Posted: Nov 8, 2017 8:36 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM <> writes:

> No. There is no model dependence. First we have to guarantee that
> omega is there and simultaneously P(omega) will be there. And then we
> can look for a model satisfying that requirement.

This is truly miraculous: WM waves His hands, and Lo!
paradise opens at His command.

Who needs proof when we have WM's Infallible Judgement?

"No proof is required": that was His catchphrase.

> Regards, WM

Alan Smaill

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.