On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 2:21:29 AM UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote: > Why do we really need those real non-constructible numbers, if it is impossible to express them exactly except only by constructible numbers or as meaningless notation in mind only? >
BKK and his fellow cranks and trolls here seem to believe, as an article of faith or religious dogma, that they can achieve everything in science and engineering that we can now do in real analysis using only a subset of the real numbers. Good luck with that, guys, but you are destined to fail. Your complete lack of any real progress after all these years (decades in some cases) should convince of you that.