
Re: Why do we need those real nonconstructible numbers?
Posted:
Nov 9, 2017 2:38 AM


On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 1:45:21 PM UTC+3, WM wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 10:06:49 UTC+1 schrieb bassam king karzeddin: > > On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 12:17:08 PM UTC+3, WM wrote: > > > Am Montag, 6. November 2017 08:21:29 UTC+1 schrieb bassam king karzeddin: > > > > Why do we really need those real nonconstructible numbers, if it is impossible to express them exactly except only by constructible numbers or as meaningless notation in mind only? > > > > > > Neither does anyone need them nor can anyone use them. At least not in mathematics. The only occupation for such nonexisting creatures is matheology. > > I wrote: > > So great that you recognize those real irrational algebraic and transcendental numbers (which are not constructible numbers) as being nonexisting creatures > WM wrote: > I meant chiefly such numbers that have not any chance to be expressed or pointed to. Irrational algebraic or transcendental numbers have at least a finite definition. When I wrote the first edition of my book "Mathematik für die ersten Semester", 4th ed., De Gruyter, Berlin 2015 I seriously considered whether I should call these objects numbers because you never can describe their exact value in what we call our numeral system, i.e., decimal system. But that would have raised too much confusion because most other teachers of mathematics would call these objects numbers. Therefore I decided to join them. After all these limits have one and only one value. Although it is not describable by decimals, we can describe them in systems based on irrational bases. But I understand fully that you are not happy with calling them numbers. > > Regards, WM
A human definition or decision can't create any existing number, only a chosen unity can create any imaginable and existing number and those real numbers known as algebraic or transcendental numbers are impossible therefore to be created from the chosen unity, thus nonexisting and purely fictional numbers as a result of human mathematical brain fart numbers
I have already provided so easy numerical refutation based on integer analysis that proves also the true polynomials are only those Diophantine Eqns. which have integer solution or no solution
Those can't be described exactly by decimal or anything else since they are truly pure fictions of human mind fart
However, the deception of (Pi) being a real number was mainly the oldest historical reason for all sources of fictional mathematics, since the visible circle we do see before our eyes is actually a regular constructible polygon with many sides that we can't distinguish, exactly the same way we do approximate it to our practical needs, whereas the absolute (Pi) exists exactly in the perfect circle that doesn't exist in any imaginable reality
Had the Greek recognized this simplest fact, then never they would have raised their three famous impossible constructions for sure
And finally, it doesn't any matter who is happy or sad in relation to what is the ultimate truth would like like
See simply, the trans. numbers are the solution of rational polynomials that don't exist, thus nonexisting numbers for sure, (noted also recently by AP)
Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin Nov. 9th, 2017

