
Re: Why do we need those real nonconstructible numbers?
Posted:
Nov 11, 2017 5:05 AM


Den lördag 11 november 2017 kl. 08:10:32 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin: > On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 1:45:25 AM UTC+3, burs...@gmail.com wrote: > > WM, you should look on the bright side, Roger > > Penrose can be happy, since the tiling is > > > > aperiodic, there will be no other copy > > of Roger Penrose standing where he stands, > > > > so he is quite unique. (Doesn't hold for > > WM, BKK, JG, AP, stupidity, stupidity is > > > > all nonunique, just zero, easily replicable). > > > > j4n bur53 schrieb: > > > Penrose looks happy: > > > > > > Roger Penrose in the foyer of the Mitchell > > > Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, > > > Texas A&M University, standing on a > > > floor with a Penrose tiling > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_tiling#/media/File:RogerPenroseTileTAMU2010.jpg > > > > > > > > > bursejan@gmail.com schrieb: > > >> Also there are uncountably many different Penrose tilings. > > >> > > >> Penrose's Pentaplexity article on aperiodic tiling: > > >> Eureka 39(1978) 1632 > > >> https://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/radin/pentaplexity.html > > >> > > >> In plane geometry, the einstein problem asks about the > > >> existence of a single prototile that by itself forms > > >> an aperiodic set of prototiles, that is, a shape that > > >> can tessellate space, but only in a nonperiodic way. > > >> > > >> Proposed solutions  > > >> 2010 by Joshua Socolar and Joan Taylor > > >> https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4279 > > >> > > >> Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 22:55:27 UTC+1 schrieb burs...@gmail.com: > > >>> Except that the reals are uncountable. > > > > > @ bursigan, j4, jan burse ...etc with all your allies > > The whole problem with you is mainly your damn references, just see this that is much worth than all the references you do always bring with you for sure > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFKSnYdLeO0&feature=share > > BKK
Dumbarse, answer me this. Do you understand the value of the supremum property?

