Den lördag 11 november 2017 kl. 10:29:01 UTC+1 skrev John Gabriel: > On Friday, 10 November 2017 23:22:17 UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote: > > Den lördag 11 november 2017 kl. 02:43:41 UTC+1 skrev John Gabriel: > > > Wiki: Frege argues that numbers are objects and assert something about a concept. > > > > > > Of course! A number is the measure of a magnitude. > > > > > > Wiki: Frege defines numbers as extensions of concepts. > > > > > > Correct! The concept of measure. > > > > > > Wiki: 'The number of F's' is defined as the extension of the concept G is a concept that is equinumerous to F. > > > > > > What an idiot! "Equinumerous" which requires that number already be established. Frege was laying the foundations for the bullshit of circular theory that was later produced by ultra-morons such as Peano and von Neumann. > > > > > > Wiki: The concept in question leads to an equivalence class of all concepts that have the number of F (including F). > > > > > > Oh dear! What the fuck is a number?!! Chuckle. Very Peano-esque. > > > > > > Wiki: Frege defines 0 as the extension of the concept being non self-identical. > > > > > > Poor guy was a fucking moron like most of you! > > > > > > Wiki: So, the number of this concept is the extension of the concept of all concepts that have no objects falling under them. > > > > > > WTF???!!! > > > > > > The bogus mainstream foundations were strongly influenced by fuckwads such as Frege. > > > > Your idea of "measure of magnitude" is not the definition so who cares what you think? > > It is the ONLY definition. There is no other. But I can't take credit for it because the idea was first realised by my brilliant ancestors.
It isn't, you can cry and moan like a child as much as you want. But it is not the definition.