Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
The non existence of p'th root of any prime number, for (p>2) prime
Replies:
71
Last Post:
Dec 16, 2017 8:46 AM




Re: The non existence of p'th root of any prime number, for (p>2) prime
Posted:
Nov 26, 2017 10:50 AM


On Sunday, November 26, 2017 at 12:35:19 PM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote: > >Primitive notion of category theory and set theory differ by in set theory it is a binaary relation called set membership while > unknown character as (Zeroz) wrote
> Incorrect, FLT does not imply anything about the existence of roots. They can be shown to exist through other means. ************************************************* So strange that (Zelos) is still here, maybe you were not convinced of many other recent topics, but never mind to show us how the cube root say for 91 can be found in all your mathematics? wonder!
I thought truly that you had left since I never see you on any other obvious topic of mine, where also you were challenged but kept so silent wonder!
So, we are waiting for your so peculiar talent to present the arithmetical cube root of 91, and don't worry much if you get stalk or juggling with it since many others of your alike would certainly learn the biggest lesson for sure
It is also good to remind you that the so easy proof had been published by me and for sure BKK



