The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: How the Church Of Academia abandoned the simple concepts for
Zermelo-Fraenkel rot. 12/7/2017 7:07

Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 7, 2017 7:11 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View

Posts: 5,511
Registered: 9/25/16
Re: How the Church Of Academia abandoned the simple concepts for
Zermelo-Fraenkel rot. 12/7/2017 7:07

Posted: Dec 7, 2017 7:11 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

You forgot:

If you made a mistake, dont be affraid to correct it.
- Konfuzius

Mistakes like all yolo blundolo

Am Freitag, 8. Dezember 2017 01:07:47 UTC+1 schrieb John Gabriel:
> The following common notions are the TRUE AXIOMS of Euclid's Elements. You will notice they are all well defined. Nothing about undefined sets or elements or relations. The axioms are very generic even though they were stated in terms of numbers in the four common notions, Book I. Of course it took a genius like me to realise what the Greeks had done.
> i. Objects that are the same as a given object, are the same as each other.
> Objects can be anything and an object is very well defined - it is a
> thing that is either tangible or intangible.
> ii. If objects are changed in the same way, then the objects are still the
> same even after they have been changed.
> Takes care of operations on the objects (things like arithmetic, etc).
> iii. An object is not the same as any of its given parts.
> Defines parts clearly (unlike elements which may or may not be sets).
> The Church of Academia abandoned these three real axioms for the shit of Zermelo and Fraenkel.
> The monkeys thought they could do better than the Greeks whose clarity of thought was unmatched by anyone before or after them.?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.