The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Isn't infinity (in mathematics) actually a flawed concept?
Replies: 4   Last Post: Jan 4, 2018 2:01 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
zelos.malum@gmail.com

Posts: 1,176
Registered: 9/18/17
Re: Isn't infinity (in mathematics) actually a flawed concept?
Posted: Dec 8, 2017 3:21 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Den torsdag 7 december 2017 kl. 13:09:38 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 12:41:55 PM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote:
> > Den lördag 18 november 2017 kl. 10:34:09 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> > > On Friday, November 17, 2017 at 7:36:10 AM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote:
> > > > Den torsdag 16 november 2017 kl. 19:26:24 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> > > > > On Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 6:20:12 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > > > > Actually this only concept in mathematics needs few minutes to verify its legality of being considered as any real good and useful concept or just a mere big fallacy that is more than meaningless and a kind of madness, wonder!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is also stranger how it led the mathematicians to built on it so many huge volumes of baseless mathematics that is good enough for little carpentry works
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And even much stranger that they had generated so many types of more infinities to the science of mathematics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the oddest thing is that mainstream common mathematicians never realize that such concepts are so meaningless the same way their results that they obtain relying on that fake concept
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And naturally such concept is indeed a real paradise for any jugglers to create so many meaningless games and shamelessly consider it as a real science
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the fact that any theorem or formula or result that is associated with such silly concept as infinity, is also so silly but may be good for entertainment
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since mainly, no definite rules with it, nor any real existence (being unreal: by its own definition)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, this flowed concept would make it very easy in the near future to make mathematics get doubled and tripled and even grows indefinitely in the fake unreal direction to its collapsed limits, for sure
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, many refutations of such meaningless concept was provided in my posts, beside many others
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > > > > > 15 th, April, 2017

> > > > >
> > > > > And assuming that infinity exists, then it is not an infinity for sure
> > > > >
> > > > > BKK

> > > >
> > > > It is one of the ZFC axioms so we have it to work with, grow up already.

> > >
> > > Which implies immediately that ZFC axioms are total nonsense for sure
> > >
> > > BKK

> >
> > No it doesn't you moron. There is no logical connection there.

>
> You are left alone with your infinity, and it is absolutely true that no any logic with this absurd term called previously as Infinity, but the fact of the story of infinity is definitely pure fun with so much humor for sure
>
> And now onwards, people must feel shame whenever talking about it, since it is a ghost in your only mind, sure
>
> And how people can substitute a suitable word instead of infinity? wonder!
>
> It is indeed very easy task but not for you since you were so addicted to it, sure
>
> Say the truth that you do apply exactly in reality whenever calculating any series for a real non-constructible number as (considering the first hundred terms and neglecting the remaining endless terms) we get this approximation in CONSTRUCTIBLE number form or generally in rational number form as it is. for sure
>
> Or you may like to be more precise by saying considering the first zillions of trillions of billions of millions of thousands of terms and NEGLECTING the much LARGER remaining ENDLESS terms, we get this RATIONAL APPROXIMATION number for our IRRATIONAL Number (LIVING ONLY IN OUR MINDS)
> BKK


Bassam, all numbers live in our mind so what is the fucking issue?



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.