Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Trapezoid definition
Replies: 26   Last Post: Oct 7, 2004 11:51 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Julio Albornoz Posts: 1 Registered: 12/10/04
Are squares rectangles?
Posted: Oct 17, 2002 12:59 PM

Hello fellow math fanatics,

The arguments about inclusive and exclusive definitions can go on for
ever especially when one tries to make one point over another. In
reference to rectangles and squares, weather a square can be defined
as a "kind of rectangle" remains to be mathematically proven.

However, let's take the real fact:

Suppose a problem reads: The perimeter of a "rectangle" is 48 ft.
Using whole numbers only, what is the dimensions that would give the
greatest area?

If we are inclusive we can say that is a 12 ft by 12 ft = 144 sq ft.
If we are exclusive we can say that is a 13 ft by 11 dt = 143 sq ft.

But what would the "correct" answer be in the real test-answer world?

Wouldn't you agree that since the problem stated "rectangle" the
exclusive way would be the correct answer?

Regards, Julio

Date Subject Author
8/7/00 John Benson
8/8/00 John Conway
8/8/00 Floor van Lamoen
8/8/00 John Conway
8/9/00 Floor van Lamoen
8/9/00 mary krimmel
8/9/00 Lee Rudolph
10/17/02 Julio Albornoz
10/18/02 Walter Whiteley
10/18/02 G.E. Ivey
10/28/03 Pamela Paramour
10/28/03 Walter Whiteley
10/28/03 John Conway
10/29/03 Mary Krimmel
10/29/03 John Conway
10/30/03 Rick Nungester
9/28/04 Kit
9/28/04 David W. Cantrell
9/28/04 NealAgMan@nyc.rr.com
9/28/04 Mary Krimmel
10/7/04 Donna W.
10/7/04 Donna W.
10/23/02 Ken.Pledger@vuw.ac.nz
10/25/02 Pat ballew
8/9/00 Jon Marshall
8/9/00 Floor van Lamoen
8/10/00 John Conway