Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [HM] Name needed for a point: Hirst?
Replies: 4   Last Post: Jan 10, 2000 3:57 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Julio Gonzalez Cabillon Posts: 1,353 Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] Name needed for a point: Hirst?
Posted: Jan 7, 2000 11:09 PM

Gunter Weiss <weiss@math.tu-dresden.de> wrote:

> From what I read and learned I got the impression, that Hirst
> simply generalised the classical 'inversion': Given a center
> C and a (regular or singular) polarity \pi in a projective
> space, then the (C,\pi)-inverse X' to a point X (not= C) is
> defined by
> (HI-1) C, X, X' are collinear,
> (HI-2) X, X' are \pi-conjugate.
>
> One will call X' the Hirst inverse to X with respect to the
> inversion center C and the polarity \pi.

This transformation has been referred to as "conic inversion". Giusto
Bellavitis (1803-1880) seems to have been the first to study it as
early as 1838. I seem to recall that Franz Seydewitz (1807-1852) was
also interested in this transformation (but not earlier than 1840). I
may look some pointers up, if necessary. Thomas Archer Hirst (1830-1892)
came later (c. 1865). By the way, there is a curious six-part series
on Hirst's life published in the Monthly (1993). And, just for the
record, let me point out that the MacTutor History of Mathematics
Archive (St Andrews, Scotland) at
http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Hirst.html
has Hirst's death-date wrong -- in fact, TAH died on February 16, 1892.

Julio Gonzalez Cabillon

Date Subject Author
1/6/00 Clark Kimberling
1/7/00 Gunter Weiss
1/7/00 Julio Gonzalez Cabillon
1/10/00 Tony Mann
1/8/00 J.G.Fauvel (John Fauvel)