Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Topic: [HM] Weierstrass, pathological functions
Replies: 2   Last Post: Aug 25, 2000 11:11 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Everdell@aol.com

Posts: 155
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] Weierstrass, pathological functions
Posted: Aug 25, 2000 11:11 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


Sam Kutler asks:

<<But, Bill and all, is that function what we had meant by continuous[?]
Sure, we meant that we can change f(x) by as little as possible by changing
x by a small enough distance, but didn't we mean more than that?>>

I submit that what we (mathematicians and other thinkers) mean by
"continuous" is in the highest degree problematical, and as philosophical
as it is mathematical. At least since Dedekind. Certainly since Robinson.
The more I can learn about the question, the better.

Bill Everdell, Edgartown, MA






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.