The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [HM] Language of Discovery
Replies: 23   Last Post: Mar 15, 2001 1:04 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
John Conway

Posts: 2,238
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] Language of Discovery
Posted: Feb 26, 2001 10:31 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Gordon Fisher wrote:

> I guess most mathematicians, in our current usages of the term,
> don't give much of a hoot about the ontological status of numbers or
> the nature of the existence of mathematical objects and processes,...

This is, of course, quite true, as a sociological observation, but
hardly has much relevance, as there are plenty of mathematicians that do.

However, to make noises of any value about these matters nowadays
really requires a considerable education in mathematical logic, and
probably less than 5% of professional mathematicians have had such an
education. Those who have are usually decidedly more dubious about
the nature of mathematical existence than those who haven't!

John Conway

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.