The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [HM] uninterrupted connectedness
Replies: 12   Last Post: Jul 23, 2004 9:43 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 16
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] uninterrupted connectedness
Posted: Jul 21, 2004 4:26 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Dear all,

it seems to me that Dedekind's statement

> Mit vagen Reden über den ununterbrochenen Zusammenhang in den kleinsten
> Teilen ist natürlich nichts erreicht (Naturally nothing is attained with
> vague talk about the uninterrupted connectedness of the smallest parts)

alludes to the traditional Aristotelian definition of continuity:

"A thing that is in succession and touches is 'contiguous'. The 'continuous'
is a subdivision of the contiguous: things are called continuous when the
touching limits of each become one and the same and are, as the word
implies, contained in each other: continuity is impossible if these
extremities are two. This definition makes it plain that continuity belongs
to things that naturally in virtue of their mutual contact form a unity. And
in whatever way that which holds them together is one, so too will the whole
be one, e.g. by a rivet or glue or contact or organic union." (from Physics,
Book V, Part 3, Translated by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye; at )

Best regards

Siegmund Probst

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.