Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » math-history-list

Topic: math query
Replies: 10   Last Post: Oct 26, 1995 6:40 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
John Conway

Posts: 2,238
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: math query
Posted: Oct 26, 1995 6:40 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I quote:

> There is another puzzle: about the Latin words for 18 and 19 - duodeviginti
> (two from twenty) and undeviginti (one from twenty), a pattern repeated
> for 28,29,38,39 etc. As far as I know this terminology long predates the
> use of subtractive notation in Roman numerals; e.g. XIX. Does this
> pattern appear in any other languages? Further also to the discussion of
> different base systems, I believe that in all Saxon languages 'hundred'
> originally had the meaning 120.
> Robert Goulding.

The same idea was used by the Romans in their names for fractions,
which are

uncia = 1/2 (giving us both "ounce" and "inch")
sextans = 1/6 (giving us "sextant")
quadrans = 1/4 ("quadrant")
triens = 1/3
quincunx = 5/12 ("quincunx" now means a certain pattern - see below)
semis = 1/2
septunx = 7/12
bes = 2/3 (from "dues partes" (= "two parts (of 3)")
dodrans = 3/4 (from "de quadrans")
dextans = 5/6 (from "de sextans")
deunx = 11/12

I was very pleased once to come across a reference to a
"dodrantal" shape in an eighteenth century book, and to understand
it! (Of course it means what's left of a disc when one quadrant is

On weights, the Romans indicated these by obvious patterns of
dots (for fractions less than 1/2), supplemented by the letter S
(for fractions greater than 1/2).

So . .
. .

meant "5/12" or "5 ounces", ie., "quincunx", which

is why this word is now used for that pattern. The
fraction 7/12 would be written "S."

All of this is taken from Menninger, who points out
that the subtractive principle in "Roman numerals" only
became widespread in medieval times. The Romans would
write VIIII rather than IX for 9.

Clocks with Roman numerals use IIII rather than IV for "4",
but this is certainly because this frees us from having to worry
which way up to put that "IV", and from confusing in with "VI".

John Conway

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2016. All Rights Reserved.