The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Plausibility Arguments
Replies: 11   Last Post: Mar 14, 1997 10:04 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Lou Talman

Posts: 876
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Plausibility Arguments
Posted: Mar 13, 1997 1:55 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Ted Alper wrote:

> all but the most rigorous level, one
> can construct plausible, convincing arguments of outright
> falsehoods. I think one should try to confront students with such
> arguments sufficiently often to at least make them suspect the
> existence of levels of reasoning beyond those they are being
> challenged to master.

Purposeful construction of misleading arguments strikes me, in most
instances, as misguided showmanship. There is a place for such
constructions at post-calculus levels, where proof begins to become
central to instruction. (I maintain that proof is important, but not
*central* until then.)

The really interesting, and difficult, question is this: How should
we deal with students who invent their own "plausible, convincing
arguments" supporting "outright falsehoods"?

The question is interesting because students who are capable of
such things (almost always innocently, of course) are very interesting
people to teach.

The question is difficult because it means we must recognize the
outright falsehood (*whatever it may be*) for what it is. (So much
for the theory that knowing how to teach is more important than knowing
what to teach!) Then we must be able to deal effectively with the

I maintain that the most effective way to deal with the situation is to
present the "prover" with an example that clearly contradicts what has
allegedly been proved. And then step aside.

At least for a while. Noticeably longer than the "prover" likes.

--Lou Talman

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.