Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
Education
»
mathteach
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Plausibility Arguments
Replies:
11
Last Post:
Mar 14, 1997 10:04 AM




Re: Plausibility Arguments
Posted:
Mar 13, 1997 4:33 PM


On Thu, 13 Mar 1997, Ted Alper wrote:
> Draw two intersecting circles, of somewhat different radius  call > their centers A and B (call the intersection points C and D). From C > draw the diameters for both circles (CE and CF, where CE goes through > A and CF goes through B). Now draw line EF, and label the points where > it intersects circle A X and label the point where it intersects > circle B Y. CXE is a right angle, since CE is a diameter of circle A; > CYF is a right angle, since CF is a dimater of circle B; X,Y,E, and F > are colinear; therefore angles CXY and CYX are right angles... so > triangle CXY has two right angles!
Thank you, Ted, for this example, I did not know it.
There are several examples which I like. One of them is a proof that an arbitrary triangle ABC is isosceles. Denote M the center of AC and m the line, which goes through M and is perpendicular to AC. Denote b the bissector of the angle B. Denote N the point of intersection of m and b. I assume that N is outside ABC (which in fact is true), but the other case (if we assume that it is possible) can be considered analogously. Drop perpendiculars NK and NL from N to the lines BA and BC respectively. It is easy to prove that triangles BNK and BNL are congruent, whence BK = BL. Also it is easy to prove that the triangles NKA and NLC are congruent, whence KA = LC. Now subrtact these equalities and you get BA = BC! This example (however, with a confused picture) was included into the useful book `Mathematical Circles' which is published by AMS and a review of which, written by me, will soon appear in the American Mathematical Monthly.
I want to continue that proofs of wrong statements are just one kind of useful ways to puzzle children. That they enjoy it is not astonishible if we remember that children love performances of magicians, mysteries, fairy tales, `science' fiction etc. But all this is just a preparation. What should come next is training in solving problems right  that is so that to avoid all these `miracles'. That is why it is so important for children to solve problems where it is clear how to check the answer and to find out whether it is right or wrong.
Andre Toom Department of Mathematics toom@universe.iwctx.edu University of the Incarnate Word Tel. 2106460500 (h) 4301 Broadway 2108293170 (o) San Antonio, Texas 782096318 Fax 2108293153



