|
|
Re: 1996 National Meeting
Posted:
Apr 14, 1995 4:00 PM
|
|
I agree that the lead time of 2 years is silly. I attended one session on
CBL's (were they even *out* two years ago?) and another on the Big Bang
(which hadn't even been proven yet).
It is nice to have a complete bulletin with topics and times well in advance,
but would anyone object to seeing a lot of topics labeled "To Be Announced"?
The veterans at my school say you shouldn't even pick by name, but by
presenter! And I must admit that the one all-day session I went to, "The
Geometric Ride of Paul Revere", didn't have much to do with Paul Revere, but
was very good because of Masunaga and company who were running it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ben Dillon (bendillon@aol.com)
St. Joseph's HS, South Bend, IN
"Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before
breakfast!" -- from Through the Looking-Glass
|
|
