The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: 1996 National Meeting
Replies: 17   Last Post: Apr 14, 1995 4:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 5
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: 1996 National Meeting
Posted: Apr 14, 1995 4:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I agree that the lead time of 2 years is silly. I attended one session on
CBL's (were they even *out* two years ago?) and another on the Big Bang
(which hadn't even been proven yet).

It is nice to have a complete bulletin with topics and times well in advance,
but would anyone object to seeing a lot of topics labeled "To Be Announced"?
The veterans at my school say you shouldn't even pick by name, but by
presenter! And I must admit that the one all-day session I went to, "The
Geometric Ride of Paul Revere", didn't have much to do with Paul Revere, but
was very good because of Masunaga and company who were running it.

Ben Dillon (
St. Joseph's HS, South Bend, IN
"Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before
breakfast!" -- from Through the Looking-Glass

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.