The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: More thoughts from the nctm-l police
Replies: 4   Last Post: Feb 23, 1995 9:20 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Tad Watanabe

Posts: 442
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: nctm-l police
Posted: Feb 23, 1995 9:20 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

This may be something I should ask my sysop here, but I've noticed many
posts are addressed to individual then cc'ed to nctm-l. For example this
post is now addressed TO: Ronald A Ward (Hi, Ronald!) and cc to Annie
Fetter and nctm-l. Do you get duplicate mails, one from me directly and
one from nctm-l? Or Majordomo handle this automatically?

I'm sorry this is a little off topic.

Tad Watanabe
Towson State University
Towson, Maryland 21204

On Thu, 23 Feb 1995, Ronald A Ward wrote:

> How narrowly is the expression "the standards" defined? For example,
> is it restricted to ONLY the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards, or does it
> also include both the Professional Standards and the Draft Assessment
> Standards?
> If the Listserv were focused on all three, I believe individuals should
> be able to relate issues to something in at least one of the three. But,
> personally, I've not been bothered by the topics that crop up. I haven't
> detected anything like the level of abuse that I've seen on the Calculus
> Reform or TI Listservs, for example.
> Ron Ward/Western Washington U/Bellingham, WA 98225

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.