The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Saxon ad
Replies: 18   Last Post: Feb 27, 1995 8:54 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Andre TOOM

Posts: 549
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Saxon ad
Posted: Feb 26, 1995 4:02 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sun, 26 Feb 1995, Tim Hendrix wrote:

> The written document expressing the Standards that NCTM endorses certainly
> does include some problems and examples of each standard.

I suggest that these problems and examples are poorly chosen.
And that this is extremely important. After all, ideas evaporate,
examples condence.

> At each grade
> level, after the statement of each standard, the writers attempt to
> "unpack" the idea behind that standard and demonstrate one example of how
> that standard can be employed in a classroom at that grade level.
> It is absurd to think that the authors are going to give an example
> of every single type of problem application of any one standard.

It would be useful.

> That is left for mathematicians and mathematics educators
> to do on their own.

Do you think that an average teacher has time and competence to do it ?

> I agree, however, that there are topics not covered as
> thoroughly in the document as could have been covered.

Could of should ?
Are there topics that are covered adequately ?

> For example, the standard PMG used from K-4 of calculators and computers.

You mean that PMG chose a wrong example. Which is the right one ?

> Unfortunately, at the other levels, 5-8, and 9-12, the use of
> technology as a means of exposing the mathematics is not addressed
> very concretely. Yet, the document was 5 years ago, and now we
> know of many examples that were not fully developed then.

Was there the stone age 5 years ago ?
Do you mean that the document is obsolete ?
Andrei Toom

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.