Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: CR: What Are Dimensions ?
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jul 21, 1995 11:15 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Amos Newcombe Posts: 6 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: CR: What Are Dimensions ?
Posted: Jul 21, 1995 11:15 AM

>One of the questions that was not satisfactorally answered during my
>undergraduate career was "What is a dimension?" I'm not sure that I will be
>able to dodge the question during the upcoming school year so I was wondering
>if anyone on these lists had a good definition.
>
>Thankyou
> marge
> MCOTTON@AOL.COM

The most intuitive idea is that if you need D numbers to describe
something, then it has dimension D. The problem with this idea is that
Cantor gave a one-one (discontinuous) mapping of a line segment to a
square, and Peano gave a (many-one) continuous mapping also from a line
segment to a square. So can a line segment and a square really be of
different dimensions when they can be mapped from one to the other like
this? In fact there can be no mapping from one to the other that is both
one-one and continuous [Brouwer 1911], so the concept of dimension is not
totally meaningless, and the effort to make it precise was one of the
driving forces behind the development of topology in the early part of this
century.

Euclid's idea was that points are of dimension zero, and lines are of
dimension one because they can be cut by points of dimension zero. Planes
are of dimension two because they can be cut by lines of dimension one, and
so on. But this doesn't really tell you what a dimension is, only how the
dimensions are built up from each other.

Another point of view focuses on the fact that as you double the scale, a
point stays they same size (2^0 = 1), a line doubles in length (2^1 = 2), a
square has four times the area (2^2 = 4), and in general an object of
dimension D has its "measure" multiplied by 2^D. (In general m^D if you
multiply the scale by m.) Objects were discovered for which this was true,
but D was not an integer, so they are of fractional dimension.

There are other concepts too.

The simple answer is that there is no simple answer. The different ideas
are related in that they all give the same answer for nice simple Euclidean
objects, but they are distinct in that they give different answers for
objects of the kind that used to be called pathological, but are now called
fractal and are at the forefront of current research, and have been for a
hundred years. It is not so often that you can get undergraduates so close
to contemporary mathematics.

Amos Newcombe | Voice (914) 339-0582 | There are three kinds of
CyberMath | Fax (914) 331-2697 | people: those who can count
Manor Lake #2 | Email: amos@cerf.net, | and those who can't.
Kingston NY 12401 | 76324.3313@compuserve.com |
| ANewc2@aol.com |

Date Subject Author
7/19/95 MCotton@aol.com
7/21/95 Ed Wall
7/21/95 Amos Newcombe