The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Mathematica vs. Maple
Replies: 1   Last Post: Jun 14, 1996 2:43 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
John Kot

Posts: 2
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Mathematica vs. Maple
Posted: Jun 14, 1996 2:43 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Stu Schaffner ( wrote:
: [snip]...
: I use Mathematica, am pleased with it, and have never had a chance to
: use Maple. One of the more interesting aspects of Mathematica is its
: underlying functional programming language. I never hear anyone
: compare the base languages of these systems. In Maple, can you manipulate
: patterns, rules, and lambda expressions, or are you stuck with loops
: and if-then-else?

I think this a very good point. I have used Maple a little, and
dabbled with Reduce. In Reduce, I found it very nice to program in a
mixture of procedures and LET rules. My impression is that in Maple
you are limited to a procedural programming style, whereas Mathematica
appears to have procedural, rule-based, and functional programming
styles as options. I would really appreciate some knowledgable
comment on this point, as it would seem to be a big limitation in
Maple, which otherwise I really like, esp. for its open library which
lets you view and modify the source of much of the stuff you use.

John Kot ( ,-_|\ CSIRO Div. of Radiophysics
tel: +61 2 372 4343 / \ PO Box 76
fax: +61 2 372 4446 \_,-._/ Epping, NSW 2121 v Australia

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.