Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: XY functions that cannot be solved
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jun 14, 1996 10:15 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 rdsilverman@qed.com Posts: 77 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: XY functions that cannot be solved
Posted: Jun 13, 1996 11:56 AM

In article <31BD7983.5C85@cliff.backbone.uoknor.edu>,
<vjohns@cliff.backbone.uoknor.edu> writes:

> > bosd@cs.utwente.nl (Rene Bos) writes:
> > >> >Please define "closed form formula".
> > >> A function that is finite in length and allowing only
> > >> predetermined constants,+,-,*,/,exponents, and roots.

> > >To me, this definition seems arbitrary. Why do you include roots, but
exclude
> > >logarithms, hyperbolic functions, etc.?
> > Aren't all definitions arbitrary? I suppose roots did not even need to be
> > included, since xth roots are just 1/xth powers.
> >

> ....
>
> It seems to me (though I have no proof) that the virtue of a closed-form
> formula lay in its being able to be evaluated with pencil and paper (or
> stylus and clay, or whatever) to any desired precision in a reasonably

Derivable by WHOM?

The problem with your "definition" is that it depends on the level
of knowledge of the person undertaking the calculation.

If one knows or can derive the Taylor expansion for f(x) or
(say) a Pade approximate or Chebyshev polynomial approximation
one can quickly do what you say. Also helpful is knowing accelerated
convergence techniques etc.

What *I* can compute quickly with pencil/paper is very probably a large
superset of what you can do quickly.

Can you compute (say) log(37.00000) to 10 digits quickly with pencil/paper?
It is not hard to someone who has the right knowledge.

Date Subject Author
6/13/96 rdsilverman@qed.com
6/14/96 Thomas Womack