The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: "Representative sampling?"
Replies: 10   Last Post: Nov 4, 2000 2:57 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jerry Dallal

Posts: 27
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: "Representative sampling?"
Posted: Nov 3, 2000 12:28 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply wrote:
> In article <>,
> wrote:

> > On Thu, 02 Nov 2000 17:44:08 GMT, Ross J. Micheals
> > <> wrote:
> >

> > > Is there a statistical definition of "representative sampling?"
> >
> > No. It is more broadly *logical* than statistical. My notion right
> > this minute is, it is most clearly defined by its negation. That is,
> > if you avoid the traps of all potential non-representative-ness,
> > then you may have representative samples.

> Surely the defining property of "representative sampling" is that it be
> entirely random. Wouldn't any non-representative mistake violate some
> notion of randomness?

Since it's not a technical term, it doesn't have a technical
The problem is that the "random" in random sample refers to the
process that generated the sample whereas, as I hear it used in
common parlance, the "representative" in representative sample seems
to refer to the specific sample that was obtained as a result of the
(possibly nonprobabilistic) sampling procedure.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.