The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: New project: certification in statistics
Replies: 17   Last Post: Nov 20, 2000 3:14 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ron Hardin

Posts: 231
Registered: 12/7/04
Re: manual recount - of punched ballots
Posted: Nov 12, 2000 6:45 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Rich Ulrich wrote:
> With 10,000 no-punches where only half that many no-votes should be
> expected (in Palm Beach County), they re-counted a 1% sample and came
> up with 47 additional votes -- about half of the 100 or so that were
> possible, and consistent with the number of no-votes that typically
> are seen. There was no report of how many no-punches had existed.
> Gore gained, as he was expected to, because Gore carried the county by
> almost 2-to-1.

Say punched cards have a 5% reject rate, a figure I've heard several
times, then a manual count without bias always raises the totals
in proportion to the existing votes. Thus as you say, a Democratic
county manually counted picks up net Democratic votes.

Would you say that therefore a Republican county with the reversed
numbers ought to be manually counted as well, if a Democratic one
is? Otherwise it would seem a net Democratic gain is guaranteed.
The county that hand counts wins an even election.

The benefit of the machine counts is the avoidance of bias. The
sign of the difference at the end of it all is an excellent estimate,
not biased, though the totals are biased low by machine counting.

A hand count improves the totals but ruins the differences. But what
you want is the differences, ie the winner, not the totals.

I have heard that punch cards are favored because they retain
vote privacy, and they consider the 5% drop rate acceptable.
Ron Hardin

On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.