The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Particle in box --> quantized E, particle in ? --> quantized S
Replies: 1   Last Post: Jun 14, 1996 8:30 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Toby Bartels

Posts: 206
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Particle in box --> quantized E, particle in ? --> quantized S
Posted: Jun 14, 1996 8:30 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

John Baez <> wrote:

>Toby Bartels <> wrote:

>>John Baez <> wrote at the end:

>>>Quiz question: what mathematical object is utterly fundamental to
>>>quantum mechanics and has BOTH an inner product and a symplectic
>>>structure? The answer is shockingly simple.

>>Well, the complex field, being a 2 dimensional vector space over the reals,
>>certainly has both inner products and symplectic products over the

>You got it. The complex numbers C - and thus every space C^n, or more
>generally every Hilbert space - has both a real inner product and a
>symplectic structure. It's nice to call the real inner product an
>"orthogonal structure", so let me do that. The orthogonal structure on
>C^n is just the real part of the complex inner product
>while the symplectic structure is just the imaginary part of the complex
>inner product, and they satisfy Re<v,w> = Re<w,v>, Im<v,w> = -Im<w,v>.

Neat. Reminds me of stuff I've seen in QFT texts, too, as it probably should.

Another way I thought of to look at this:

Any bilinear form <,> gives rise to symmetric and alternating forms:
v.w := <v,w> + <w,v> and v^w := <v,w> - <w,v>.
Even though the Hilbert space inner product is complex valued,
as a consequence of its sesquilinear nature,
the symmetric and alternating forms associated with it are real valued,
which is what gives us our orthogonal and symplectic structures.
(Actually, the alternating form is pure imaginary,
but that comes to the same thing.)

-- Toby

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.