The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.num-analysis

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Opinions on LAPACK++?
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 11, 1996 2:01 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Elef Gkioulekas

Posts: 1
Registered: 12/15/04
Re: Opinions on LAPACK++?
Posted: Dec 11, 1996 2:01 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply writes:

>That's an interesting opinion. Personally, I'd like to see more people
>agree with it. I've had the occasion to replace IMSL functions when the
>licensing terms became too onerous in the multiple site world.

Haven't seen the original postings on this. I tried to get LAPACK++ working
on our DECalphas here. It failed a couple of tests. I was disappointed.
It looks well-designed though, and I might borrow some of their ideas.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.