Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Replies: 44   Last Post: May 1, 1999 5:30 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ulrich Weigand

Posts: 72
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Posted: Apr 21, 1999 9:29 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply



Nathan the Great <mad@ashland.baysat.net> writes:

> (1) Is Cantor's Diagonal Number a completed infinity?

It is one specific real number. Depending on how you define real numbers,
you'll need an infinite amount of information to specify a real number,
however. E.g. if you define real numbers by Dedekind cut, every real
number is itself an infinite set.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by 'completed' infinity, though.


> (2) Does the "one-fell-swoop" in the proof below terminate?

Again, please specify exactly what you mean by 'one-fell-swoop'.
If you somehow interpret this as an algorithm of some kind, of course
it does not terminate.

Nevertheless, if you interpret is an a method of specifying a certain
real number, it is valid as such.

[snip]

> row 1.23456 Diagonal
> --- ------- --------
> 1 3 3
> 2 3.1 1
> 3 3.14 4
> 4 3.141 1
> 5 3.1415 5
> 6 3.14159 9


>Now, in one-fell-swoop construct all the digits of NDN. This changes NDN into a
>completed infinity.


This specification defines a certain real number (namely, pi). If you
choose to interpret a real number as 'completed infinity' then this is so.


>First, in the construction of each specific digit of NDN, the list must contain a
>rational number that extends to that digit's location. This pre-existing listed rational


>number, as far as it extends, is equal to NDN. Hence, NDN is rational (as far as its
>digits extend).


This makes no sense. You again confuse different things. On the one hand,
you have a sequence of rational numbers defined by your construction.
Each of these is, well, rational. But none of these is equal to NDN.

NDN is the real number specified as limit of the sequence of these
rational numbers. As such, it may be rational or irrational; you'll
have to examine the number itself to find out which is the case (and
of course, in this particular case, the number is irrational).



--
Ulrich Weigand,
IMMD 1, Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg,
Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Phone: +49 9131 85-7688






Date Subject Author
4/14/99
Read Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Papus
4/15/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Webster Kehr
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Alan Morgan
4/18/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Webster Kehr
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Dave Seaman
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Bill Taylor
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Jake Wildstrom
4/19/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Sami Aario
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Ken Cox
4/19/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Michel Hack
4/20/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/20/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Ulrich Weigand
4/21/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/21/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/21/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Ulrich Weigand
4/21/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Brian David Rothbach
4/21/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Virgil Hancher
4/22/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/22/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Sami Aario
4/23/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/25/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Sami Aario
4/22/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Ulrich Weigand
4/23/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/23/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Ulrich Weigand
4/20/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Nathaniel Deeth
4/17/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Papus
4/19/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Kevin Lacker
4/20/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Bill Taylor
4/19/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Andrew Boucher
4/19/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Kevin Lacker
4/21/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Andrew Boucher
4/22/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Keith Ramsay
4/23/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Andrew Boucher
4/24/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Keith Ramsay
4/25/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Andrew Boucher
4/27/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Bill Taylor
4/27/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
David Petry
4/30/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Keith Ramsay
5/1/99
Read Re: Bill Taylor's comments on uncomputable reals
Keith Ramsay
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Andrew Boucher
4/16/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Dave Seaman
4/18/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Webster Kehr
4/19/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Jeremy Boden
4/19/99
Read Re: Continuum Hypothesis Solution Posted
Sami Aario

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.