|
|
Re: -1 x -1 ?
Posted:
Sep 17, 1999 10:08 PM
|
|
Dale Henderson wrote in message <7rudbk$u6l$1@nnrp1.deja.com>... > >I've seen a few proofs on this thread that make unfounded assumtions. >One assumes the uniqness of inverses and another assumes 0x=0. >Ironically the result (-a)b=-ab is requred to prove 0x=0.
That's not really true. 0 = 0x - 0x = (0+0)x - 0x = 0x + 0x - 0x = 0x.
|
|