In article <76068b$k2q$1@phys-ma.sol.co.uk>, "Robert Harrison" <mongrels@streamlinerec. nospamprestel.co.uk> wrote: > Is Nathan deliberately using vague or poorly posed > questions, arguments etc. in an area of mathematics > ripe for misunderstandings (infinite sets) to solicit > nonsense from otherwise sound contributers to sci.math? > > Or is he genuine?
A lot of things would be a lot simpler if there were a reasonable way to decide this question (believe it or not analogous questions come up a lot around here). Years ago I would have assumed he must be putting us on. But there's no such thing as something so ridiculous that it's clearly a joke - whatever it is you can find someone somewhere who believes it.
> And am I just paranoid?
Tough question. (At least we want you to _think_ we don't know the answer. haha.)
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
