>> ... I'm certainly an agnostic on >> whether there exists a simple proof. But I'm sure it won't be found >> with a drunkard's walk through random algebraic manipulations. >> Especially when performed by a fool who stops every time his >> egregious error frequency leads to a contradiction, and needs >> to wait for someone competent to find his mistakes for him.
Sheesh, and I thought I knew better than to answer the fool's ravings. But here goes.
>Well, I'm certain that you not only don't have any idea about how to >actually discover anything but that you're a rude and obnoxious >person who has the manners of someone raised in a barn....
I'm amused at being told what I can't discover by such a ridiculous wannabee. I guess it's a lot like a lot of things Harris is "certain" of.
But the idea that I'm a meanyhead for calling him a fool is pretty silly. The source of fifty garbage proofs in four years is clearly a fool, either the kind who's just idiotic or the kind who's just acting. I'm charitable enough to believe he's a sincere dolt.
Well, he always has to have the last word, and I'd rather not prolong his rant beyond what I've already done, so I hope I can trust the good people of sci.math to treat his response to _this_ message with all the respect it deserves.