|
|
Re: Clive Tooth's newsgroup stalking
Posted:
Jan 10, 2000 6:18 AM
|
|
David C. Ullrich wrote in message...
>
> James Harris wrote:
>
> > David C. Ullrich wrote in message ...
> > >
> > >
> > > That's sort of what I thought, thanks. (Was really more curious
> > > about James' definition, but of course I'll never see that, since
> > > he doesn't read posts that are not well thought out, like mine.)
> >
> > Oh, I read them.
>
> Contradicting yourself once again - last time it came up you said
> you didn't, because they were not well thought out.
>
> Does the word "consistency" mean anything to you? If you ever
> decide you want to try to achieve a goal like that a hint would be
> to restrict your comments to statements that are actually true.
> It's probably possible to achieve consistency without worrying
> about that, but it's very difficult (and when you fail everyone
> knows that you don't always tell the truth.)
>
Well, I had a feeling that I'd made a mistake replying to that post, but it
was hard to resist. So, you had to go and show exactly why I don't like to
reply to your posts.
Look back a little bit and you'll see a post where I state that there's no
longer anybody on my list of people who's posts I will not read.
For anyone to whom this sounds strange, a while back I had a list of about
three people who I said there'd be no replies to them because I didn't see
the point. This fellow was already on that list because he seems to get too
emotional for my tastes about what I say. I figure it's safer just to leave
him be. He made a comment that I left in this reply, and in a judgement
lapse I went ahead and answered it. And now you see what I got for that.
Oh well. Live and learn.
|
|
