|
|
Re: Introducing the United (fps) System
Posted:
Apr 24, 2000 12:45 PM
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:19:33 GMT, "Donald G. Shead" <u10889@snet.net> wrote:
> > >Jeff Gauld <jgauld@norlink.net> wrote in article ><LLADOZWPpeyxurQubuVN2D1gP+ga@4ax.com>... > >SNIPPED a lot of nonsensensical stuff that was designed solely for >harrasment:
Hey, I did raise a number of salient points. You haven't made an attempt to answer them. Why not?
>So with the factory manufactured copies of standard feet (calibrated on >rulers & tape measures), pounds (calibrated on weighing scales), and >durations (calibrated with clocks); that can be purchased in any good >hardware store, and a good head; we can proceed to conduct empirical >experiments that will give us to understand the intricacies of force and >its effect on changing the motion of masses (objects and/or bodies) of >material matter:
Yes we can. We can do this today. We can use any system of measurement we desire. Of course SI is the logical choice, since it is the worldwide standard, and is the simplest...
>We can even do some things with electricity, using off the shelf devices, >and their instructions, that detect and quantify it:
Yes we can. What's your point?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
|
|