> From: Joan Shields <email@example.com> > Newgroups: sci.bio.technology, sci.bio.misc, sci.math, > bionet.molbio.evolution, bionet.microbiology > > Stats haven't always been one of my strong points but there is something I > think I can add - something I think a lot of people are overlooking. > > Whether or not is would take, on average, X numbers of tries in order to > form amino acids - you have to remember that all those different > combinations didn't/don't occur one right after the other - they can > happen all at once. In other words, evolution doesn't just happen in a > straight line - mutations occur everywhere and in every direction. If you > look at mutations that have been successful, then it appears that > evolution is going in a line (or meandering path).
But they have to occur at the right time in combination with a lightening strike, etc.
> Just look at how variable HIV is. All these mutations all occuring at the > same time - some are viable and some aren't. Some are better at surviving > for a while or better at transmission or better at eluding drugs and the > body's own systems.
But in all cases, it is STILL HIV, right?? I.e. no evolution occurred - adaptation, variability of a species yes - but not evolution. No new "creature" was created.
> Anyway, hope this made sense. Oh, and one more thing - who ever said that > evolution had to be constant? From what I've read there's been some > debate as to how constant the rate is.
Yes - punctuated equilibrium says it happened in spurts
> That's the funny thing about nature - we try to make it fit into very > simplistic creations of our own - get very irritated when she refuses to > fit :).
Or just assert that it DOES fit when some get frustrated - instead of considering all the evidence.
*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^ * David Beorn, firstname.lastname@example.org (internet) * * Virginia FREENET * *-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^